Almost everything you do on the Internet is governed by Terms of Service. The language in Terms of Service typically gives Internet providers broad rights to address potential account misuse. But do these Terms alter Fourth Amendment rights, either diminishing or even eliminating constitutional rights in Internet accounts? In the last five years, many courts have ruled that they do. These courts treat Terms of Service like a rights contract: by agreeing to use an Internet account subject to broad Terms of Service, you give up your Fourth Amendment rights.
This Article argues that the courts are wrong. Terms of Service have little or no effect on Fourth Amendment rights. Fourth Amendment rights are rights against the government, not private parties. Terms of Service can define relationships between
private parties, but private contracts cannot define Fourth Amendment rights. This is true across the range of Fourth Amendment doctrines, including the “reasonable expectation of privacy” test, consent, abandonment, third-party consent, and the private search doctrine. Courts that have linked Terms of Service and Fourth Amendment rights are mistaken, and their reasoning should be rejected.
William G. Simon Professor, University of California, Berkeley Law School. Thanks to Riana Pfefferkorn and Rebecca Wexler for comments on an earlier draft.
Founded in 1852 as the American Law Register, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review is the nation’s oldest law review.
Quicklinks
Contact Us
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia PA 19104-6204
Telephone: (215) 898-7060
Email: lawrev@law.upenn.edu
© 2024 Penn Law Review. All Rights Reserved.